Trade name law for startups: when will your trade name be protected?

For startups and scale-ups, a trade name is often more than just a label on the website. It's the name under which you pitch, bring in customers, contract and speak to investors. That is precisely why it is important to know when that name receives legal protection, how far that protection extends and what misunderstandings come back in practice.

At Startup-Recht, we regularly see that founders think that the protection of a trade name starts with registration in the Trade Register or when registering a domain name. That is too short of a curve. At its core, trade name law is about the lawful use of a name in trade, and about the reputation that that name builds as a result.

What exactly is a trade name?

A trade name is the name under which a company appears in trade. It is therefore about the name by which the company identifies itself to the public. The name is the set of characters that make a company recognisable, not its design.

The latter is relevant. A particular font, use of color, or graphic style is not in itself part of the trade name. The way in which a name is visually designed can play a role in a conflict, but when it comes to what the trade name itself is, it's about the name as such.

For tech companies, this is an important distinction. Many young companies invest early in branding, design and online visibility. But a well-designed logo is not legally the same as a trade name, and a visual identity does not replace the requirement that the company actually appear under that name.

Not every name is automatically a trade name

Not every use of a name also immediately results in a trade name. This requires that a company be run under that name. The law refers to a company that participates commercially in economic traffic, seeks material benefits and acts externally as a more or less permanently organized relationship.

That seems abstract, but in practice, the message is clear. A separate project, a one-off initiative or a name that only circulates internally does not quickly produce a trade name. A term that only describes the nature of the company, or only names a building or location, is also not necessarily a trade name.

For startups, this is relevant at the earliest stage. A concept name on a slide deck or in a Notion document is different than a name under which you actually go to market. There must be sufficient visible, sustainable participation in trade.

When does trade name law arise?

The right to a trade name occurs because people are going to use that trade name lawfully. That is the starting point. It is remarkable, however, that the scope of that right is not solely determined by the mere use of the name, but mainly by its worthy reputation.

There is immediately a nuance that is essential for startups and scale-ups. You can already use a name, but still have not built up enough fame to be widely protected. Conversely, even a name that is not actively used at any time can still be known enough to be protected if there is a risk of confusion with another name.

In many cases, the extent of the protection will depend on how much the name is used. The more visible and consistent the name appears in trade, the more likely it is that the name has also built up a relevant position among the public.

For founders, this means that trade name law is not an on or off button. It does not arise through a single formal act, but grows along with the way in which the company presents itself in the market under that name.

Protection can start before the real launch

An interesting and practically important point is that protection does not only start when the company is fully operational. Protection can also arise in the preparation phase, namely when contact is sought with third parties under a name in the run-up to business activities.

This is particularly relevant for startups. Think of a phase where there is already communication with suppliers, developers, launching customers, investors or cooperation partners under an intended name. Even without a full market introduction, that name can therefore already gain legal weight, provided that name is actually used to describe the company externally.

This is good news for young companies that are still building, testing and collecting. At the same time, it requires discipline. Anyone who uses different names interchangeably in the pre-launch phase, or only communicates experimentally without a clear line, is less likely to build up a recognizable position under one trade name.

What counts as using a trade name?

Using a trade name can take place in various ways. The name can appear on stationery, buildings, vehicles, advertisements, correspondence, on a website or in a logo, provided that the name is actually legible as a name. Use as a domain name can also be relevant.

Use that often counts

The core is always that the use must reach the public sufficiently. A trade name is not protected because it is somewhere in a system, but because it functions visibly as the name of the company in economic traffic.

Use by third parties can also sometimes indicate that a company has a certain name. This is the case, for example, when others write or refer to the company under that name, while that name also matches the way in which the company presents itself.

Furthermore, a company does not have to be limited to one trade name. It can use multiple trade names, including for part of its activities or a separate segment of the company. This is relevant for tech companies with different propositions or activities.

Which isn't automatic enough

At the same time, not every use is sufficient. A certain degree of sustainability is needed. Using a name once or only a few times is often not enough. Only oral use can count under circumstances, but not quickly.

There are also two misunderstandings that persist in practice. First, registration in the Trade Register is not decisive for whether a trade name exists. Such a registration may be an indication, but it does not in itself prove that the name is actually used as a trade name. Secondly, the mere registration of a domain name does not result in the use of a trade name. That can also be a clue, but no more than that.

For startups, this is often exactly where it comes in. The domain name has been registered, the company is registered, the logo has been designed, but the actual market communication under that name is still limited. Legally, this is a different situation than many founders think.

The statutory name is not the whole story

In the case of a private or limited company, the registered name is in any case the trade name. But that doesn't mean it all has been said. In addition, a company can also use other trade names, such as an abbreviation or a name for a specific part of the activities.

This is important for scale-ups with a holding structure, operating companies or different business lines. The name in the statutes is therefore relevant, but not necessarily the only name that matters legally in trade. The practice of outside intervention remains decisive.

This point is also important for companies that mainly work internally with company names while operating externally under a different name. Then it is possible that it is precisely that external name that forms the center of gravity of the trade name position.

Does a trade name have to be distinctive?

One of the most surprising points in trade name law is that distinctive character is not a hard condition for having a valid trade name. Unlike brands, therefore, a trade name does not necessarily have to be distinctive in order to be considered a trade name.

This means that descriptive names can also be valid trade names. This is interesting for startups and scale-ups, because many young companies opt for names that directly say something about their product, service or market segment.

There is, however, a practical limit. In principle, descriptive parts of a trade name may also be used by others in their usual sense, as long as the rest of the name does not confuse companies. In other words, a descriptive trade name can exist, but it does not automatically offer a monopoly on the descriptive words that make up that name.

For founders, this is an important reality check moment. A name can be legally useful as a trade name, without that name being highly exclusive. It is precisely the degree of distinctiveness that plays a role in the question of how much room there is to act against other people's names that look like them.

Protection is related to familiarity

Trademark law is therefore not only about whether a name is used, but also about the degree of reputation worthy of protection. This makes trade name law very practical, but also factual.

For example, a holding company that barely goes public may have too little reputation, even if it exists formally and has a name on paper. Conversely, with visible and consistent market communication, a company can build a stronger position more quickly.

This is a clear lesson for startups. If you want to protect a name, you should not only register but, above all, operate consistently under that name. Think of communication with customers, suppliers and investors, and visibility on relevant channels. Not as separate incidents, but as a sustainable expression of the company.

International situations can also count

Protection can also be invoked for foreign companies if their trade name is sufficiently well known in the Netherlands and there is a risk of confusion here. This does not require that the company is located in the Netherlands, the name is used here or that its own sales area already exists here.

For Dutch startups and scale-ups, this works both ways. On the one hand, it is a warning when choosing a name with international ambitions. A foreign player may have already built up a relevant position in the Netherlands without being physically located here. On the other hand, it shows that international visibility can also be legally relevant, especially when your audience does not comply properly with national borders.

In the tech sector, where visibility often occurs online and across borders, this is not a detail but a serious point of attention.

Transfer of a trade name: pay attention to deals and restructuring

Trade names can be transferred, but not separately from the company that is operated under that name. This is where the trade name differs from other IP rights that entrepreneurs sometimes think of more quickly.

This is important for transactions, carve-outs and internal reorganizations. In principle, the trade name goes with the company. The simultaneous transfer of name and company does not necessarily have to take place at exactly the same time, but the name cannot be removed from the company as a separate object as if it were just a label.

In addition, the company under that trade name should in principle be fully transferred. It is therefore not intended that part remains with the original rights holder and continues to operate under the same name, unless both companies can coexist under the same name without the risk of confusion, for example because activities are split.

For scale-ups that grow via new entities, spin-outs or group restructuring, this is a point that often comes too late. The question then is not only who gets the shares or assets, but also how the trade name legally changes with the company that is active thereunder.

What about a license?

The law does not explicitly regulate the trade name license. This is logical, because the trade name is naturally linked to a specific company. However, trade name licenses do occur in practice, especially in franchise structures.

There is an important limitation here. Because the license is not legally developed as with other IP rights, the licensee cannot rely on the licensor's previous use against third parties.

This is relevant for growth models. As soon as a company comes out under the same name through other parties, new structures or license-like agreements, careful consideration must be given to what that means legally. Not everything that makes commercial sense automatically fits in with the system of trade name law.

What does this mean in concrete terms for startups and scale-ups?

The most important lesson is that trade name law is much less formal than often thought, but that is why it also requires more attention. Protection comes from lawful use in trade. Registrations can help as a clue, but do not replace that use.

For startups, this means that the choice of a name must be directly linked to how that name is presented. A name that only exists internally or administratively does not build a strong position. A name that is used visibly and consistently already in the preparation phase can actually become relevant earlier than many entrepreneurs expect.

For scale-ups, the challenge often lies in complexity. There are multiple entities, multiple names, international activities, sub-labels and sometimes restructuring or collaborations. Then it is crucial to be clear about which name is used by which company, how familiar that name actually is and whether a transfer or license is legally consistent with actual business operations.

At Startup-Recht, we see that trade name issues are rarely just about name choice. They also touch on positioning, structure, growth and the question of how a company can be recognized in the market. That's why it pays to think early about the legal side of using your name.

Conclusion

A trade name is not created by paperwork alone. Protection starts with the lawful use of the name, and its scope is strongly related to the worthy reputation that that name builds up in trade.

For startups and scale-ups, this means: choose consciously, use consistently and don't underestimate the preparation phase. Those who see trade name law as a purely administrative step are missing exactly where the legal value of a name comes from in practice.

‍